In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Korrespondenz des Grafen Mauritz von Bentheim-Tecklenburg Herr zu Steinfurt mit dem Bischof Christoph Bernhard von Münster
Grafschaft Tecklenburg - Akten >> 3. Herrschaft Rheda >> 3.2. Beziehungen zu den benachbarten Territorien >> 3.2.1. Stift Münster
1652-1675
Enthaeltvermerke: enthält: Schnadgang bzw. Vereinbarung wegen der Grenzen der Ämter Stromberg und Sassenberg mit der Herrschaft Rheda, u.a. bei Harsewinkel und dem Werth beim Rockwinkel, zum Streit des Grafen mit dem Bischof von Osnabrück über die Pfarrsache zu Gütersloh bzw. angeblicher Verstoß gegen das Instrumentum Pacis bei der Vertreibung des katholischen Pfarrers aus dem Pfarrhaus; Zusicherung der Unterstützung des Grafen in der Ehrsache beim kaiserlichen Hof, 1675, darin: Kaiserliches Schreiben an den Bischof wegen der Beschwerde der Stadt Münster über den Versuch, sich ihrer zu bemächtigen, Ausschaffung des den Bürgern nicht genehmen Lieutenants Nagel, Kassierung des Landtags in Coesfeld, 1655
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.