In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Streitigkeiten zwischen Nassau-Siegen (katholischer Landesteil) und Nassau-Dillenburg wegen der Grenze und der Jagd im Grund Burbach an der Wilnsdorfer Grenze
Streitigkeiten zwischen Nassau-Siegen (katholischer Landesteil) und Nassau-Dillenburg wegen der Grenze und der Jagd im Grund Burbach an der Wilnsdorfer Grenze
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten >> 11. Grenzsachen >> 11.3. Grenze zwischen dem Amt Siegen und dem Grund Burbach
(1607) 1655-1660, 1694-1695
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Berichte des Burbacher Amtsvogts Beel über Grenzzwischenfälle und Jagdvergehen; Korrespondenzen zwischen den Fürsten zu Nassau-Siegen, Nassau-Dillenburg und Grafen zu Sayn-Wittgenstein wegen der Grenzstreitigkeiten im Grund Burbach; Grenzbesichtigungen; Abschrift eines Notariatsinstruments des Notars Johann Friedrich Löscher vom 10.06.1607 betreffend die Grenzen zwischen dem Grund Burbach und dem Haingericht gegen Wilsdorf; Korrespondenzen zwischen den Siegener und den Dillenburger Räten wegen der Jagd eines siegenschen Jagdbediensteten auf dem so genannten Weißenberg (1695). Enthält auch: Obligation des Juden Moyses zu Herborn über 300 Reichstaler für Reitpferde des Prinzen von Hessen-Homburg (07.11.1694). Korrespondenten u.a.: Johann Franz Desideratus Fürst zu Nassau-Siegen, Amtsvogt Engelbert Beel (Burbach), Ludwig Heinrich Fürst zu Nassau-Dillenburg, Johann Daumb (Dillenburg), Heidfeld (Dillenburg), Johann Heeser (Dillenburg), Kanzleiregistrator Johann Jacob Dornberger (Siegen), Johann Wittling (Siegen), Johann Jacob Jäger (Altenkirchen), Ludwig Albert Graf zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Neumagen.
63 Bl.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.